1727 Dundee Manuscript

commonly called THE DUNDEE MANUSCRIPT attributed to the year 1727


Transcribed from the Scots Magazine for March, 1755. vol. xvii. pp 132-7. The Scots Magazine MDCCLV Volume XVII. Ne quid falsi dicere audient. ne quid veri non audeat Edinburgh; Printed by Sands, Donaldson, Murray and Cochran. Part for March, 1755. Pages 132 to 137 To the author of the Scots Magazine.

Dear Sir

Some time ago a Mason living at a considerable distance from me, whom I knew to have the character of a sensible and religious man, sent me a long paper, all of his own handwriting, and subscribed by him; in which he makes a confession of the oath word, and other secrets of his craft. When he wrote that paper, and for a good time before, he was confined by bodily distress; and he represents his having been brought under a conviction of whole affair as a mystery of iniquity. His narrative is intermixed with reasonings from many texts of scripture, and otherwise, about the iniquity of the matter. He considers the oath as profane and abominable, what was sinful for him to take and sinful to keep; he treats of all the secrets which are therein sworn to, as a compound of superstitious ceremonies, lyes, and idle nonsense; and he renounces the whole as a horrid wickedness. At the same time, he urges me to publish the paper for the conviction of persons engaged in that oath, and for warning others to beware of the snare; allowing me to discover his name, his place of abode and the Lodge he belonged to. However, I have only drawn out his narrative, which I here offer you, in his own words, for a place in your Magazine; leaving the world to judge of the matter as they please. He informs me that the account he gives is only of what he himself was taught, according to the usage of the Lodge in which he entered; without regard to some circumstantial variations which may take place in some other lodges, while they agree in substance. And indeed an absolute uniformity among them cannot be supposed, if, according to what follows, the whole affair must be committed only to their memories, and share in the common fate of oral traditions.

A mason's confession of the oath, word and other secrets of his craft.

These are to testify, concerning that oath, word and other secrets held among the corporation of masons; wherein I was taken under the same, by sundry of them gathered together and met at Dundee about the year 1727. Concerning the oath after one comes in at the door, he that keeps the door, looses the garter of his right-leg stocking, folds up the knee of his breeches, and requires him to deliver any metal thing he has upon him. He is made to kneel on the right knee, bare; then the square is put three times round his body and applied to his breast, the open compasses pointed to his breast, and his bare elbow on the Bible with his hand lifted up; and he swears, "As I shall answer before God at the great day, and this Company, I shall heal and conceal, or not divulge and make known the secrets of the Mason-word, (Here one is taken bound, not to write them on paper, parchment, timber, stone, sand, snow, &c.) under the pain of having my tongue taken out from beneath my chowks, and my heart out from beneath my left oxter, and my body buried within the sea-mark, where it ebbs and flows twice in the twenty four hours."

Immediately after that oath, the administrator of it says, "You sat down a cowan, I take you up a mason." -- when I was taken under that oath, I knew not what these secrets were which I was not to divulge, having had no information before. One person in the Lodge instructed me a little about their secrets the same day that I entered, and was called my author; and another person in the Lodge, whom I then chused to be my instructor till that time twelve-month, many called my intender; ---- There is a yearly imposing of that oath in admissions among the said craft through the land on John's day, as it is termed, being the 27th of December.

Concerning the Word

After the oath, a word in the scriptures was shown me, which, said one, is the mason-word. The word is in I Kings vii,21. They say Boas is the mason-word, and Jachin a fellow-craft-word. The former is shewn to an entered prentice after he has sworn the oath; and the latter is shewn to one that has been a prentice at least for a year, when he is admitted to a higher degree in their lodge, after he has sworn the oath again, or declared his approbation of it.

Concerning the other Secrets

I shall next shew a cluster of different sorts of their secrets. First, then, three chalk lines being drawn on the floor, about an equal distance, as at A.B and C: the master of the Lodge stands at P., and the fellow-crafts, with the wardens and entered apprentices, on the master-mason's left hand at ff and the last entered prentice at p.

Says the master: "Come forward".

Says the prentice: "I wot not gin I may."

Says the master, "Come forward, I warrant you."

Coming over the first line with one foot, while he sets the other square off at a. he lays the right hand near the left shoulder, and says, "Good day, gentlemen."

Coming over the second line with one foot, while he sets the other square off at b. , he lays the right hand on the left side and says, "God be here".

Coming over the third line with one foot, while he sets the other square off at c. he lays the right hand on the right knee and says, "God bless all the honourable brethren".

N.B. as the square was put thrice about his body when on the bare knee, so he comes over these lines setting his feet thrice in the form of a square.

N.B. To the best of my remembrance the whole lodge present did not exceed twenty persons; but so I was taught to answer which I can give no reason for.

N.B. If they ca, in two irons above and one below, it makes a kind of both square and level; though ordinarily they ca, in but one. And the reason it is said set square and not to hang it is They're not to hang their master.

N.B. The token or grip is by laying the ball of the thumb of the right hand upon the first or uppermost knuckle of the second finger from the thumb of the other's right hand.

N.B. They do not restrict themselves to this number, though they mention it in form of questions but will do the thing with fewer.

N.B. One is taught, that the cowans stage is build up of whin stones, that it may soon tumble down again; and it stands half out in the lodge, that his neck may be under the drop in rainy weather to come in at his shoulders and run out at his shoes.

N.B. There is no such thing among them as a cappel-tow.

N.B. A lodge is a place where masons assemble and work, Hence that assembly or society of masons is called a lodge.

N.B. I can give no reason why the sun and the sea are called two of their levels, but so they will have it. To be particular in shewing how the master-mason stands at the south-east corner of the lodge, and the fellow-crafts next to him, and next to them the wardens, and next the entered prentices, and how their seiges stand distant from another, and the tools they work with, is not worthwhile

N.B. This is meant of their oath under which the secrets of the lodge are hid from the drop; that is from the un-entered prentice, or any others not of their society, whom they call drops.

And this is the amount of that invented matter; or all I can remember that is material in it.

P.S. There was printed, in the year 1747 (ix.404) A protestation and declinature from the society of Operative masons in the lodge at Torphichen, to meet at Livingston kirk. Dec 27, 1739: subscribed, of that date, at Kirknewton, by James Chrystie: with a subscribed adherence, at the same place of the same date, by James Aikman, Andrew Purdie and John Chrystie: and with another subscribed adherence, at Dalkeith, July 27, 1747, by John Miller. In that paper, they renounce the mason-oath, as finding the same "sinful and unlawful". both as to its matter and form, and therefore not binding upon their conscience." They declare, that it is imposed and administered, "With such rites:, ceremonies and circumstances as are in themselves sinful and unwarrantable and a symbolising with idolaters; such as; kneeling upon their bare knees, and the naked arm upon the Bible;" --- That "it is and must be to intrant be sworn rashly; without allowing a copy of the said oath and time duly and deliberately to consider the lawfulness of it; the matter thereof, or things, sworn to therein, never being under their serious consideration previous to the swearing of that oath; seeing the person swearing knows what he is swearing to;" -- That they "do look upon the dreadful wickedness, superstition, idolatory, blasphemy and profanation of the name and ordinance of God, which is contained in and annexed to that oath, altogether unbecoming the name and professions of Christians; by the which unlawful means of secrecy, many are rashly and inconsiderately precipitated and slily drawn into that sinful confederacy and wickedness above said, ere ever they can be aware of it." --- What "it is an appending the seal of a solemn oath, containing horrid, dreadful and uncommon imprecations, to a blank, yea to worse, to ridiculous nonsense and superstition: nonsense, (and that with this aggravation, of profaning the sacred scriptures, by intermixing them therewith), only fit for the amusement of children in a winter-evening; most of the secrets being idle stuff or lyes, and other parts of it superstitions, only becoming heathens and idolaters." -- Moreover, they declare, that the secrecy is broke and disclosed, by "what is already published to the world in print; concerning which, (they say) there have been many lyes and equivocations, in denying the same, though they contain in the substance of the mystery.

I am etc. D.B.

N.B. With his letter, above inserted, Mr. D.B. sent us the paper he mentions (132), which is dated Nov 13, 1751 and another of the same handwriting and subscription, dated Feb 20, 1752, also a paper containing several queries which he sent to the mason, for explaining some things in his papers, and the mason's answers. Having compared the preceding narrative with these papers, we find that it is faithfull taken from them; so that whatever shall be thought of the mason's conduct, which it does not become us either to justify or condemn, the authenticity of the narrative may be depended on.)

The Scots Magazine: vol.xvii. pp 132-7. March, 1755.

©Transcribed by Iain D. McIntosh, 2009